Table 2

Diagnostic accuracy of urine glucose test strip, capillary fasting glucose and HbA1c determined by comparison with the composite reference standard (n=1289)*

Urine glucose test strip positivecFBG≥126 mg/dLHbA1c>6.5%
True positive (n)33173176
False positive (n)73416
False negative (n)2016158
True negative (n)104810211039
True diabetes prevalence† (95% CI)18%, 234/1289 (16 to 20.4)
Sensitivity (95% CI)14.1 (9.90 to 19.2)73.9 (67.8 to 79.4)75.2 (69.2 to 80.6)
Specificity (95% CI)99.3 (98.6 to 99.7)96.8 (95.5 to 97.8)98.5 (97.5 to 99.1)
Positive PV (95% CI)82.5 (67.2 to 92.7)83.6 (77.8 to 88.3)91.7 (86.8 to 95.2)
Negative PV (95% CI)83.9 (81.7 to 85.9)94.4 (92.8 to 95.7)94.7 (93.2 to 96.0)
Positive LR (95% CI)21.3 (9.50 to 47.5)22.9 (16.3 to 32.2)49.6 (30.3 to 81.1)
Negative LR (95% CI)0.90 (0.80 to 0.90)0.30 (0.20 to 0.30)0.30 (0.20 to 0.30)
  • *Excludes individuals taking diabetes treatment that day (n=6), did not fast before OGTT as instructed (n=5) or did not complete the OGTT (n=16).

  • †Composite reference standard: OGTT ≥200 mg/dL or cFBG ≥200 mg/dL. Seventy patients with cFBG≥200 were not tested by OGTT.

  • cFBG, capillary fasting blood glucose; LR, likelihood ratio; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PV, predictive value.