Table 2

Studies, effect sizes and moderator variables included in the meta-analytical database

Authors	Year	Study goal	Setting	No. of teams	Professional composition	Team famil-iarity	Average team size	Task type	Patient realism	Perfor-mance measure
Amacher et al 80	2017	0.11	Emergency medicine	72	Uniprofessional	Experi-mental	3	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Brogaard et al 60	2018	0.43	Obstetrics	99	Interprofessional	Real	5	Non-routine	Real	Process
Burtscher et al 81	2011	−0.27	Anaesthesia	31	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	2	Routine	Simulated	Process
Burtscher et al 82	2011	0.19	Anaesthesia	15	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	2	Routine & non-routine	Simulated	Process
Burtscher et al 83	2010	0.07	Anaesthesia	22	Interprofessional	Real	3	Non-routine	Real	Process
Carlson et al*9	2009	0.83	Emergency medicine	44	Uniprofessional	Experi-mental	2.6	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Catchpole et al 62	2007	.45†	Surgery	24	Interprofessional	Real	9	Non-routine	Real	Process
Catchpole et al ⁶²	2007	.29†	Surgery	18	Interprofessional	Real	5	Routine	Real	Process
Catchpole et al 63	2008	.36†	Surgery	26	Interprofessional	Real		Routine	Real	Process
Catchpole et al ⁶³	2008	.09†	Surgery	22	Interprofessional	Real		Routine	Real	Process
Cooper84	1999	0.50	General care	20	Interprofessional	Real	4	Routine	Real	Process
Davenport et al 85	2007	0.17	Surgery	52	Interprofessional	Real		Routine	Real	Outcome
El Bardissi et al 86	2008	0.67	Surgery	31	Interprofessional	Real	7	Routine	Real	Process
Gillespie et al 87	2012	0.23	Surgery	160	Interprofessional	Real	6	Routine	Real	Process
Kolbe et al 88	2012	0.33	Anaesthesia	31	Interprofessional	Real	2	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Künzle et al 89	2009	0.56	Anaesthesia	12	Interprofessional	Real	2	Routine	Simulated	Process
Manojlovich et al 90	2009	0.11	Intensive care	25	Uniprofessional	Real	36	Routine	Real	Outcome
Manser et al 61	2015	0.39	Surgery	19	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	5	Routine	Simulated	Process
Marsch et al 91	2004	0.23	Intensive care	16	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	3	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Mazzocco et al 92	2009	0.11	Surgery	293	Interprofessional	Real	6	Routine	Real	Outcome
Mishra et al 93	2008	0.05	Surgery	26	Interprofessional	Real	6	Routine	Real	Process
Schmutz et al 94	2015	0.12	Emergency medicine	68	Interprofessional	Real	6	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Siassakos et al 95	2012	0.66	Obstetrics	19	Interprofessional	Real	6	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Siassakos et al 96	2011	0.55	Emergency medicine/ obstetrics	24	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	6	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Thomas et al 97	2006	0.23	Neonatal care	132	Interprofessional	Real	5	Non-routine	Real	Process
Tschan et al 98	2006	0.23	Emergency medicine	21	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	5	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Tschan et al 99	2009	0.37	Emergency medicine	20	Uniprofessional	Experi-mental	2.65	Non-routine	Simulated	Outcome
Westli et al 100	2010	0.18	Emergency medicine	27	Interprofessional	Real	5.1	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Wiegmann et al 101	2007	0.56	Surgery	31	Interprofessional	Real		Routine	Real	Process
Williams et al 102	2010	0.18	Neonatal care	12	Interprofessional	Real	5	Non-routine	Real	Process
Wright et al 103	2009	0.81	General care	9	Uniprofessional	Experi-mental	4	Non-routine	Simulated	Process
Yamada et al 104	2016	0.11	Emergency medicine	13	Interprofessional	Experi-mental	3	Non-routine	Simulated	Process

*Carlson, Min & Bridges has been identified as an outlier and therefore excluded from the analysis.
†Effect sizes (r) with an † represent an average for a single sample and a single outcome and have been combined for this meta-analysis.