Table 1

Academic internship track evaluation model (adapted from Stufflebeam and Coryn16)

CIPP model of evaluation
Type of evaluationQuestions askedMethods
ContextWhat educational need is being met?
What goals should be pursued to meet the needs?
Literature review
Meetings with key stakeholders
Online survey of undergraduate medical students
InputWhat are the most promising approaches to meeting the educational need?
What might some of the barriers to successful implementation of the programme be?
Literature review
Curriculum review of similar programmes
Meeting with Director of UKAFP, an established programme
Online survey of undergraduate medical students
ProcessTo what extent was the programme carried out as planned?Review of recruitment to process: post uptake and attrition
Survey of exiting academic interns seeking feedback on programme
ProductTo what extent did the programme effectively address the original objectives?Review of scientific outputs of previous participants in the programme
Feedback from exiting interns on career intentions
Monitoring of career trajectory and retention in Ireland
  • CIPP, Context, Input, Process and Product; UKAFP, UK’s Academic Foundation Programme.