Article Text
PDF
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to determine the mediating role of psychological distress and domestic violence in the association of fear of COVID-19 with marital satisfaction and sexual quality of life (QoL) among Iranian women of reproductive age.
Methods A cross-sectional study comprising 324 married women was conducted. Online convenience sampling was used to collect data. SPSS PROCESS macro was used for the mediation analysis. The direct and indirect effects of the fear of COVID-19 on sexual QoL and marital satisfaction were estimated comprising a 95% CI using 5000 bootstrap samples. Pairwise comparisons between the mediators were calculated by Hayes’ macros.
Results A positive/negative or suspected history of COVID-19 infection had marginally significant relationship with marital satisfaction (p=0.049). The total effect of fear of COVID-19 on sexual QoL was significant (b=−1.31, SE=0.20, p<0.001). Fear of COVID-19 had no significant direct effect on sexual QoL (b=−0.22, SE=0.19, p=0.24) but it had an indirect effect on sexual QoL via mediation of psychological distress (b=−0.34, SE=0.09, 95% CI: −0.53 to −0.19) and domestic violence (b=−0.75, SE=0.18, 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.40). The total effect of fear of COVID-19 on marital satisfaction was significant (b=−1.91, SE=0.32, p<0.001). Fear of COVID-19 had no significant direct effect (b=0.20, SE=0.25, p=0.42) on marital satisfaction but it had an indirect effect on marital satisfaction via mediation of psychological distress (b=−0.59, SE=0.13, 95% CI: −0.86 to −0.36) and domestic violence (b=−1.51, SE=0.29, 95% CI: −2.08 to −0.92).
Conclusion The fear of COVID-19 during the pandemic indirectly decreased women’s marital satisfaction and sexual QoL via increased psychological distress and domestic violence. Consequently, in critical situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, improving couples’ psychological health and reducing domestic violence are likely to improve women’s sexual QoL and marital satisfaction.
- public health
- sexual medicine
- obstetrics
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY
An appropriate sample size and the application of structural equation modelling provided methodological and statistical rigour to the study.
The cross-sectional design of study meant the directionality between variables could not be determined.
The reliance on self-report data provided the possibility of biases (eg, social desirability).
The convenience sampling method meant the study sample was not representative.
Introduction
At the end of 2019, the outbreak of pneumonia of unknown cause in Wuhan (China) was announced by the WHO. The pathogen quickly became known as the COVID-19 and which subsequently caused a worldwide pandemic.1 The outbreak of COVID-19 was recognised as a public health emergency of international concern that endangered international public health.2 Epidemics of infectious diseases not only affect the physical health of individuals but also the mental health and well-being of non-infected individuals.3 The prevalence of COVID-19 has increased psychological distress such as anxiety, depression and stress among general populations.4 5 Due to the outbreak of COVID-19, a wave of fear and anxiety related to the rate of transmission as well as its complications and mortality emerged internationally.6–9 As the virus continued to spread around the world, it brought new stresses, including physical and mental health risks, isolation and loneliness, the closure of schools and businesses, economic vulnerabilities and job losses.10 11
Consequently, the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant changes in individuals’ lifestyles in individual, family and social dimensions. Changes also occurred regarding sexual aspects of individuals’ lives, such as the frequency of sexual activity, sexual satisfaction and fertility decisions.12 13 Measures to control the spread of the disease, such as being forced to stay at home, working from home, keeping children at home, the need to maintain physical distance and limiting physical contact with others, alongside the fear of infection resulted in changes to the dynamics of interpersonal relationships and sexual behaviours among many individuals.14 15 More specifically, the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals’ sexual lives has been reported in countries such as Spain, Italy and Iran.15 Marital satisfaction and quality of sexual life are two components of sexual life that may be affected by the individual, family and social effects during critical situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.16 17
Marital satisfaction refers to the amount and quality of enjoyment and satisfaction among individuals in relation to their married life.18 Marital satisfaction affects many aspects of individual and social life.19 20 Stability in marriage and marital satisfaction helps sustain the mental health of the family as well as mental health of the community more generally.21 Marital satisfaction is a unique experience, as well as being a relatively stable attitude and characteristic that reflects the overall evaluation of individuals concerning their marital relationship.22 Marital satisfaction also refers to adaptation of an individual’s current situation in a marital relationship to his or her expected situation.23 Sexual quality of life (SQoL) is another sexual component of a couple’s life that might have been affected during COVID-19 pandemic.24 In critical situations such as pandemics, changes in economic and social conditions can be associated with a reduction in various aspects of QoL, including sexual aspects.25
Many factors can affect marital satisfaction and sexual lives of couples including physical problems,26 isolation,27 depression,28 anxiety,28 fear,27 emotional instability,29 intimate partner violence22 30 and quality of sexual relations.26 31 SQoL is an important concept for assessing short-term and long-term outcomes of sexual problems on individuals’ QoL.32 The COVID-19 pandemic can affect the quality of sexual life affecting individuals’ mental health and well-being (via increased fear, depression, anxiety and stress) among both infected individuals and the general population.2 33–36 Moreover, the pandemic may have affected individuals’ sex lives in different ways. Some may abstain from sex because they are afraid of getting infected while others may increase the frequency of sexual behaviours with their partner due to spending more time at home with them.13 During the COVID-19 pandemic, fear, external stresses, psychological health problems and domestic violence increased and affected the processes of the couple’s relationship and created more instability for couples.17 37 Domestic violence (including intimate partner violence, child abuse and adult abuse) and sexual violence can increase during and after major disasters or crises.10 38 Similarly, it appears that domestic violence increased due to quarantine and spatial distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak.39 Based on a recent systematic review, it was reported that the fear of COVID-19 influenced sexual relationships and intimacy and reduced marital satisfaction.40 Turliuc and Candel reported that a combination of an external stressor like fear of COVID-19 with an internal stressor like socioeconomic status can lead to different responses regarding marital satisfaction. They reported that men and women responded differently during a crisis and that couples with lower socioeconomic status are more prone to greater stress and lower levels of marital satisfaction.41 In another study, Reizer et al reported that psychological distress mediated the association between fear of COVID-19 and couple’s marital satisfaction.42
Overall, it appears that fear of COVID-19 can affect couples’ relationship and sexual life in different ways through the interaction of different variables. As there is cultural difference in variables affecting marital satisfaction43 44 and their sexual behaviours,45 46 assessing the impact of living with the COVID-19 pandemic in different cultures is warranted. The fear of COVID-19 as external stressor and its effect on the marital relationship and SQoL among Iranian women has not been investigated in previous studies. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the mediating role of psychological distress and domestic violence in the association of fear of COVID-19 with marital satisfaction and SQoL among Iranian women of reproductive age.
Methods
Design and participants
A cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2020. The sample comprised 324 married women recruited from urban health centres. The eligibility criteria included being married, living with spouse and having at least 6 months of cohabitation with the spouse. The exclusion criteria included having history of chronic physical or psychological disease, experience of stressful events in the past 3 months, pregnancy and lactation (less than 6 months).
Sample size estimation
The sample size was calculated using R software. By considering (1) two mediating variables, with 95% CI and 90% test power, (2) the two-stage sampling, 5000 bootstraps and (3) the correlation of 0.5 between the predictor variable and the response, the number of participants was determined to be 260. Considering 20% loss of the sample, the sample size estimation indicated 312 participants would be needed.
Sampling procedure
Convenience sampling using the online platform Porsline was used to host the survey. A link to the survey was sent to midwives working in urban comprehensive health centres. They were asked to send the link to potentially eligible clients. The survey link was active until the required number of participants had been obtained.
Measures
Sociodemographics
The survey included two sections that asked questions concerning participant sociodemographic information (eg, age, age of spouse, duration of marriage, family economic status, occupation, spouse’s occupation) and information concerning sexual reproduction (eg, number of children, monthly frequency of sexual intercourse).
Marital satisfaction
A short version of the 115-item ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Questionnaire47 was used to assess marital satisfaction. More specifically, the 47-item Persian version was used.48 Items (eg, ‘My partner and I understand each other perfectly’) are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (completely agree) to 5 (completely disagree). The total score ranges from 47 to 235 and higher scores indicate higher marital satisfaction. Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.82.
Sexual quality of life
The 18-item Female Sexual Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess sexual functioning and QoL among women49 Items (eg, ‘When I think about my sex life, I find it an enjoyable part of my whole life’) are rated on a six-point scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 6 (strongly disagree). The total score ranges from 18 to 108 and higher scores indicate a better quality of female sexual life. Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.78.
Domestic violence
The four-item Domestic Violence Questionnaire (Hurts, Insults, Threatens and Screams) was used to assess domestic verbal and physical violence.50 Items (eg, ‘How many times in the last 12 months has your spouse physically harmed you?’) are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (frequently). The total score ranges from 4 to 20 and higher scores indicate greater domestic violence. Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.85.
Psychological distress
The 14-item Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale was used to assess depression (seven items) and anxiety (seven items) among outpatient populations51 (Persian version52 53). Items (eg, ‘Still enjoy the things I used to enjoy’) are rated on a four-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (most of the time) with total score of 42. Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.86.
Fear of COVID-19
The seven-item fear of COVID-19 Scale (which was originally validated in Persian) was used to assess fear of COVID-19.6 54–56 Items (eg, ‘I am most afraid of COVID-19’) are rated on a five-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 7 to 35 and higher scores indicate greater fear of COVID-19. Cronbach’s α in this study was 0.79.
Study measures are provided as online supplemental file.
Supplemental material
Patient and public involvement
Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this study.
Statistical analysis
Study data were analysed using SPSS software (V.24). Continuous variables were described with means and SD whereas categorical variables were described with frequencies and percentages. To assess the mediating roles of domestic violence and psychological distress in relationship between fear of COVID-19, SQoL, marital satisfaction, psychological distress and domestic violence, SPSS PROCESS macro was used.57 PROCESS macro is a well-documented bootstrapping statistical technique to test the mediation effects between variables. Due to the fact that the study tested multiple mediators (eg, domestic violence, psychological distress), Model 4 was chosen. The direct and indirect effects of the fear of COVID-19 on SQoL and marital satisfaction were estimated comprising a 95% CI using 5000 bootstrapped samples. Moreover, pairwise comparisons between the mediators were calculated using Hayes’ macros.58
Results
Demographic characteristics
In this study, the mean age of the 324 married Iranian women was 35.05 years (SD=6.60), with a mean duration of marriage of 0.90 years (SD=7.07). The majority of women had university academic education (86.4%) and were employed (64.8%). The majority of participants reported having average family economic status (59.6%) (table 1).
Distribution of study variables among participants
Difference between marital satisfaction and psychological distress based on COVID-19 infection status
The majority of participants reported that they had no history of COVID-19 infection (72.5%). The mean score of marital satisfaction (out of 235) was higher among individuals without COVID-19 history (mean=168.06, SD=35.06) compared with individuals recovered from COVID-19 (mean=162.75, SD=31.68) and individuals suspected of COVID-19 (mean=141.78, SD=35.40).These differences were statistically significant (p=0.049). The mean score of psychological distress was higher among individuals suspected of COVID-19 (mean=17.22, SD=7.12) compared with individuals without COVID-19 history (mean=13.80, SD=7.56) and individuals recovered from COVID-19 (mean=13.11, SD=6.61).
Relationships between fear of COVID-19, marital satisfaction and SQoL
Mean scores of marital satisfaction, fear of COVID-19, experiencing domestic violence, anxiety, depression and SQoL are reported in table 1. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis showed there were significant differences between these variables and marital satisfaction (table 2).
Pearson correlation matrix concerning the variables of interest
The results of the mediation analyses are reported in tables 3 and 4. As table 3 shows, both domestic violence (b (95% CI) = −0.75 (–1.22 to –0.40), SE=0.18) and psychological distress (b (95% CI) = −0.34 (–0.53 to –0.19), SE=0.09) significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and SQoL. Moreover, pairwise contrasts of the indirect effects (ie, domestic violence minus psychological distress) included zero (b (95% CI) = 0.42 (–0.002 to 0.83), SE=0.21) indicating that both mediators had equally strong effects.
Models of the effect of fear of COVID-19 on sexual quality of life with psychological distress and domestic violence as mediators
Models of the effect of fear of COVID-19 on marital satisfaction with psychological distress and domestic violence as mediators
As table 4 shows, both domestic violence (b (95% CI) = −1.51 (–2.08 to –0.92), SE=0.29) and psychological distress (b (95% CI) = −0.59 (–0.86 to –0.36), SE=0.13) significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and marital satisfaction. Moreover, pairwise contrasts of the indirect effects (ie, domestic violence minus psychological distress) indicated that the specific indirect effect via domestic violence was larger than that via psychological distress (b (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.29 to 1.54), SE=0.32).
Discussion
This study investigated the mediating role of psychological distress and domestic violence in the association of fear of COVID-19 with marital satisfaction and SQoL among women of reproductive age. The mean score of marital satisfaction was 168.86 (out of 235). Both domestic violence and psychological distress significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and SQoL with equal strong effects. Also, both domestic violence and psychological distress significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and marital satisfaction via a larger effect of domestic violence compared with psychological distress.
The mean score of marital satisfaction was 166.03 (out of 235). In the study by Mousavi, the results also showed that the home quarantine in COVID-19 pandemic does not have a significant effect on marital satisfaction.59 In previous Iranian studies, the mean score (out of 235) for marital satisfaction was 167.6460 and 185.51.61 Despite the changes in the living conditions of individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic, marital satisfaction does not appear to have increased or decreased significantly in comparison to previous Iranian studies. It may be that the COVID-19 pandemic has a greater influence on individuals’ social relationships rather than their interpersonal and marital relationships, especially as married couples are likely to have spent more time with each other during the pandemic than time spent with friends and work colleagues.
There was a marginal significant difference in mean scores for marital satisfaction among different groups based on COVID-19 status (without COVID-19 history=168.07, recovered from COVID-19=162.75 and suspected for COVID-19 individuals=141.78, p=0.049). Marital satisfaction appeared to be more affected and reduced among individuals suspected of having COVID-19. Despite the point that due to low the sample size in the suspected COVID-19 group (n=9), it makes it difficult to interpret the comparisons; but marital satisfaction was negatively associated with psychological distress (person correlation coefficient of −0.543). Those individuals suspected of COVID-19 experienced a higher mean score of psychological distress (17.22) compared with individuals without COVID-19 history (13.80) and individuals recovered from COVID-19 (13.11). This point was confirmed in the meditational analysis. Psychological distress and domestic violence significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and marital satisfaction via a larger effect of domestic violence compared with psychological distress. Experiencing domestic violence directly associated with lower marital satisfaction among females during the COVID-19 pandemic. Experiencing domestic violence was inversely associated with marital satisfaction, which is in line with previous findings.62 As aforementioned, during the COVID-19 pandemic and due to imposed lockdowns, many couples will have spent more time together at home. For some couples whose interpersonal relationships increased disruption, spending more time together may have increased the likelihood of domestic violence among such couples. Domestic violence negatively affects couples, especially women’s marital satisfaction.10 38 39 63–66 Consistent with the findings of this study, it has been found that increased depression was directly inversely associated with marital satisfaction. Mental health is one of the most important factors in success and continuity of marriage.67 Experiencing a mental health disorder reduces the likelihood of satisfactory relationships between individuals before68–71 and during the COVID-19 pandemic.41 72
Quality of sexual life was directly associated with marital satisfaction and increased quality of sexual life was associated with higher marital satisfaction. This is in line with previous studies.60 Sexual factors have a positive effect on couples’ marital satisfaction.73 Unsatisfactory (or lack of) sexual intercourse can lead to feelings of frustration, burn-out and insecurity, as well as endangering individuals’ mental health by disrupting family life.74 However, in an Indian study during the COVID-19 pandemic, the frequency of sexual intercourse, sexual satisfaction and the quality of sexual life among women increased during this period.75 Domestic violence and psychological distress significantly mediated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and SQoL with equally strong effects. In this study, fear of COVID-19 was significantly associated with SQoL. Inconsistent results regarding the association between fear of COVID-19 and SQoL have been reported in previous studies. While there was a negative association between the fear of COVID-19 and female’s SQoL during the pandemic in one study76 (the same as this study), in some of the previous studies, fear of COVID-19 was not significantly associated with SQoL.24 77 This difference might be due to different sampling time because the COVID-19 pandemic has had both peak and plateau periods of disease transition in different countries. To the best of the present authors’ knowledge, no previous study has investigated the relationship of SQOL and fear of COVID-19 through the mediating role of domestic violence and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar to this study’s finding, Sheikhan et al’s study conducted before the pandemic found that sexual violence was the most significant predictor of SQoL among females and that perceived stress indirectly effected SQoL.78
Strengths and limitations
To the best of the present authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to investigate the mediating roles of psychological distress and domestic violence in the association of fear of COVID-19 with marital satisfaction and SQoL among Iranian women of reproductive age. While the appropriate sample size and the use of structural equation modelling in the mediation analysis could be considered as strengths of current study, there are a number of limitations. The main limitations of the study were the cross-sectional design (which meant that the directionality between variables could not be determined), the reliance on self-report data (which are subject to well-known methods biases such as social desirability), the Iranian female sample (which meant the findings cannot be generalised to women in other countries), and the convenience sampling method (which meant the sample was not nationally representative of Iranian women). Another limitation was that the research was conducted only in an urban area. These problems could be overcome in future research by recruiting larger and more representative samples, and by employing longitudinal study designs.
Conclusion
This study showed that the presence of positive or suspected COVID-19 infection versus healthy status is associated with decreased marital satisfaction. Experiencing lower domestic violence, increased quality of sexual life and lower depression significantly predicted higher marital satisfaction among married Iranian women during the COVID-19 pandemic. It appears that the fear of COVID-19 can indirectly affect a female’s marital satisfaction by affecting their psychological health.
Data availability statement
Data are available on reasonable request.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Ethics approval
This study involves human participants and was approved by Regional Ethics Committee in Biological Research affiliated to Qazcin University of Medical Sciences (IR.QUMS.REC.1399.258; approval date: 30/09/2020. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.
Acknowledgments
Vice chancellor (Research) of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences has provided financial support to this project.
References
Supplementary materials
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Footnotes
Contributors SK, NB, ZA and AP contributed to the conception and design of the study. AP contributed to data analysis and interpretation of findings. SK, NB, ZA and AP drafted the manuscript. MDG provided contributions to the literature review and substantially edited the primary manuscript and prepared the final version of the manuscript. AHP and NB are authors responsible for the overall content as the guarantor. All authors revised the manuscript, agreed to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the study, and read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published. All the authors met the criteria for authorship, and they are listed as coauthors on the title page.
Funding Qazvin University of Medical Sciences financially support the project (Grant ID: 1399).
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.